Skip to main content

define "terrorist."

huffingtonpost.com
I can't help but wonder why folks are so afraid to call the mass shooting in Tuscon, Arizona an act of terrorism. The fear of the "T" word seems almost palpable in describing the gruesome events that took place this past Saturday...

my responses to the article:
  • - yes, there is a race component within how this word is used. but the politics are more powerful: some of the same Mujahideen who reagan called "freedom fighters" in 1983 became "terrorists" in 2001.
  • - if shown to be politically motivated, i think a lot of americans will accept that Loughner is a terrorist. especially since it involves assassination.
  • - Sirhan Sirhan is regularly described as a terrorist - is it because he is palestinian, or because he assassinated a political figure? i think both.
  • - the man who flew a plane into the austin IRS building was described (in media) as deranged AND as a terrorist. same for Ted Kaczynski. so, maybe if you're white, you are called a crazy terrorist instead of a sane terrorist.
  • - this might reveal something about the way america sees itself: for a palestinian or iraqi to attack U.S. interests, well, that is sort of rational because they have a grievance (americans recognize that there is a motivation of some sort, even if they would label that motivation "evil"). on the other hand, we think of [white] americans as being the beneficiaries of U.S. policy, so if [white] americans are angry about it, they must be acting against their own interests. which would be "crazy."
  • - one of the effects popularly defining "terrorism" is a general sense of terror, a fear of continuing daily life. the southern white lynch mobs of the 1950s definitely fit the definition, but the word was not popular in U.S. media until the 1960s - and domestically, it began as a derogatory label only for leftist groups (weathermen, black panthers, etc.).
  • there was initially a lot of resistance by U.S. conservatives to the idea that right-wing political actors could also be terrorists. this was played out in the controversy over the My Lai massacre. like Abu Ghraib, My Lai was so horrific it should not have been controversial at all. it was probably not until Timothy McVeigh that the republican party fully acknowledged the possibility of white, right-wing, U.S. born terrorism (i think of the perpetrators of all these events as terrorists; obviously, rumsfeld disagrees).
  • - tucson is different because there is no critical mass of terror. the article gives a list of events, but the events have been separated by years and many miles.
  • - a sequence of events attacking a group of people, we would think that looks more like terrorism (even if the attacks were uncoordinated or the attackers were apparently "crazy")
  • - many "terrorists" who kill civilians in afghanistan are motivated by offers of money. without a political message, i'm not sure how it's useful to define them as "terrorists." maybe they were hired by "terrorists"?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

translation of the Manu Chao song "Me Llaman Calle"

this is about my translation of the Manu Chao song "Me Llaman Calle." [ video below ] i'm reasonably close to a literal translation, with changes to fit the rhythm and number of syllables per line. "baldosa" is like ladrilla (a brick to build a house) except flat like a tile. based on context, i translate it as "cobblestones." Chao also uses "maquinita," literally "little machine," but this implies a small device in english (a machine that does something, but does not move itself - such as a laminating machine, a blood-glucose meter, or an ATM) - so i use "little engine" instead, to imply movement. the one line i'm not happy with is the translation of "no me rebajo"; if i wasn't worried about rhythm, i would translate it as "it doesn't dig ruts into me." the tricky part is that this word, rut, is almost never used as a present-tense transitive verb in english. we generally use it as a noun (

"Our Founding Illegals"

"Our Founding Illegals" by William Hogeland New York Times, December 26, 2006 [not only are we a nation of immigrants - we are a nation of illegal immigrants. undocumented workers. including our "greatest" european ancestors.] America’s pioneer values developed in a distinctly illegal context. In 1763, George III drew a line on a map stretching from modern-day Maine to modern-day Georgia, along the crest of the Appalachians. He declared it illegal to claim or settle land west of the line, all of which he reserved for Native Americans. George Washington, a young colonel in the Virginia militia, instructed his land-buying agents in the many ways of getting around the law. Although Washington was not alone in acquiring forbidden tracts, few were as energetic in the illegal acquisition of western land... Washington harbored no fond feeling for breakers of laws that he too had recently flouted. “It is hard upon me,” he lamented without irony, “to have property which has

totino's ad campaign

totino's ad campaign - okay, there are these commercials on TV about a thing called "totino's pizza rolls." apparently it is a very tiny hot pocket. the gimmick seems to be that kids can prepare this food themselves (not sure how this is any different from every other convenience food). of all the features these cubes have, the commercial focuses on taste as a selling point. obviously, frozen cubes of bleached white flour taste great no matter what. - so this kid microwaves a bag of these things, then serves them to his friends in the middle of the night. he warns they must be quiet, i guess to avoid waking his parents. but it turns out the cubes are so delicious his friends are unable to stay quiet. "i love totino's pizza rolls!" screams the first taster. - as screams erupt from everyone, the betrayed boy-chef expresses dismay at the punishment which will surely follow. oh, i jest. his parents will probably eat the cubes themselves after they come dow